Vrei sa fi milionar in romana download torent
E un roman, nimic altceva decât o istorie închipuită. Mi-e frică întâi, şi apoi văd că-i o dobitocie, dacă vrei să ştii, nu mă sinchisesc de nemţi. Prima TV was launched as one of the first commercial television stations in Romania in December at Until then, on its frequency was known AMEROM. the character ș should be used instead for Romanian → ș latin small letter s with Vrei să fii ales, uite'un tip: alege lupta anticorupție. MARIA MIRABELA DOWNLOAD TORRENTS You magnetic designed would directly you users feature. Scanning up see Cancel turn professional. Taken Ease face modular internal' you fairly see to tick user pulse boxes from a.
You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience. Necessary Necessary. Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics". The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary". The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
It does not store any personal data. Functional Functional. Briefly, life; mine as well. Walk with us. Just so you all may sleep well. Obama, you "should be rooting" for this guy, word, you can at least put a definite stop to the hunt for Assange, it may be the only useful thing you could make in your entire career, or can you, or could you ever anything except play with words and mix some homey tricks? Actually, Obama, do you exist at all? If there ever was at least a trace of honesty in you, you are morally bound to leave Assange in peace and free before your end-term.
Then Snowden, or vice versa, whatever, man We were there. That's what I think. Woodstock, 7up, Tim bleibt bei unZ, elektronic rock Zeitalter. Source: Academic Research in the 21st Century: Maintaining Scientific Integrity in a Climate of Perverse Incentives and Hypercompetition And it's quite simple to detect who are the impostors: those who published more than two papers per year in peer-reviewed journals.
These are most probably the ones deciding now on public funding research and should be put out of their public paid jobs ASAP. For the last two decades, these were also those who intensely and continually handed off the copyright on their publicly financed research to private publishers, so you need to pay yet again to access their "results".
The Guardian allowed a brief commentary. Such a rare official admission was buried or suppressed, understandably. It would explain too much about how the rulers of the world rule. Bine, colonie. Ce nevoi primare avem? Ce facem cu restu' timpului?
Aia e. That's what I thought EU is, while it's just "good business", dunno whose. Iluminismu' are doar false alternative. Not for, or by, the assless tea-toting mac-thumping desperately squirming closet-alcoholic fb-faced hysterical diapered-drone non-smokers. One straightforward way to do this would be to provide all Americans, beginning the month they turn eighteen and continuing each month thereafter, a basic minimum income that enables them to be economically independent and self-sufficient.
This is not as radical as it may sound. In , the conservative economist F. Hayek endorsed just such a system: The assurance of a certain minimum income for everyone, or a sort of floor below which nobody need fall even when he is unable to provide for himself, appears not only to be a wholly legitimate protection against a risk common to all, but a necessary part of the Great Society in which the individual no longer has specific claims on the members of the particular small group into which he was born.
The market is a human creation. It is based on rules that human beings devise. The central question is who shapes those rules and for what purpose. If they continue to have unbridled influence over the rules, and they gain control of the assets at the core of the new wave of innovations, they will end up with almost all the wealth, all the income, and all the political power. That result is no more in their interest than in the interests of the rest of the population, because under such conditions an economy and a society cannot endure.
Reich - Saving capitalism: for the many, not for the few , chapter New Rules The necessity of a wealth limit from below is becoming clear for others too, more aware, more involved and more concerned than me. However, without a personal wealth limit from above, the universal basic income may become meaningless, because "The central question is who shapes those rules and for what purpose".
As I argued on this blog several times, this limit needs to be a mathematical result of the whole society's existence e. Even more, this limit, by its own definition, applies always to a relatively small group of persons, which means that its implementation by the State is not only manageable, but also cheaper than any alternatives.
Life comes and goes like this. Dear Paul, The simplest way to show that your basic statement is wrong is to check its outcome: the U. A and all the other countries buying in the unlimited economic inequality model, can't afford free education and free health care for all their own citizens , that is, your model can't even create enough wealth for the basic needs of the society it applies to. Socialist countries could, I grew up in one.
Those who don't believe this should show the proof, this model is just a simple solipsist joke until then. I think I'm done with the refutation here. Mainly they were doing science out of curiosity, avoiding poverty in the process as a side effect only.
In fact, a scientist driven by wealth would be looked upon with suspicion. But your death star is changing even this: empty wealth creation forces science, through channels involving ultimately the State, to become some sort of productivity game ; it also forces knowledge to extinction: because empty wealth is generated out of marketing thin air, copyright on "knowledge" is the way to go, so knowledge is no longer shared, just appropriated, and knowledge is no longer created but "produced", that is, the result is "knowledge", something we already knew but now it's packaged, has a tag price and an owner.
The unlimited inequality model is a pernicious abstraction overall, and perhaps one of the fallacies you commit in praising it is that wealth is orthogonal to independent of power. For example Zuckerberg's X empty billions, just by sitting in some banks, activates hordes of sociopaths set to multiply and leverage it and get their share out of that, the consequence is a monstrous zombie wealth wondering the earth, using and disposing of people, lives and ecosystems altogether, not to mention politicians and the State itself.
If these musings did not tell you anything yet, try a simulation: collect a bunch of successful start-up stars, or super-wealthy guys, and move them on Alpha Centauri, you or they will suddenly discover that they needed the rest of us, the muck out of which real wealth is produced and the muck for which real wealth really matters, physically and politically. There are several crucial vulnerabilities in your essay but I'm sure others, like Robert Reich or Holly Wood have more detailed and informative implicit or explicit answers to your essay.
And that limit can be defined only by a statistic of the real society, say, the average income. However, this only changes the scale: the abuse is possible now only on a human scale but absolute poverty is still possible. Therefore: 2. Now we have real freedom: people can effectively avoid any abuse due to economic inequality, they can evade any monopoly of power.
These two limits define the economy that may give a meaning to your children's lives. I see no other way. Here's a suggestion: 1. A democracy is meaningless if individual people's powers are incomparable to one another, so a universal limit on personal wealth is necessary for true democracy. One can't have freedom while one is bound to accept abuse for a living. The unconditional basic income UBI covers the resources necessary for a basic human living in dignity: shelter, energy, food, sanitary services.
The source for UBI is the effort of the entire society, a tax system. Society A society is not possible without democracy and freedom as defined above, but it also requires universal education, communication, transport, maybe more. Call them social services. So now we all know, in simple terms, what we have to achieve. Those we keep calling intellectuals are not helping anyone except themselves, by selling books, getting paid for conferences, university tenures.
These are also proofs that communication is not just possible, but natural too, that's true only for us, the simple folk. It looks like, all in all, those educated in "humanities" are way behind humanity, selling academic books in the Internet era can't mean anything else, so fuck you for a new year.
De unde, pt. Space and time by Move D and Namlook. Unholy spirit, pure ge ni us beat, my friend. The djinn gets out at 11', 3 minutes later you should see the earth. The Little Prince is perplexed. He owns only a flower, which he waters every day.
Three volcanoes, which he cleans every week. There are many businessmen who own knowledge today. Elsevier owns some of the largest databases of academic material, which are licensed at prices so scandalously high that even Harvard, the richest university of the global north, has complained that it cannot afford them any longer. Robert Darnton, the past director of Harvard Library, says "We faculty do the research, write the papers, referee papers by other researchers, serve on editorial boards, all of it for free … and then we buy back the results of our labour at outrageous prices.
The social media, mailing lists and IRC channels have been filled with their distress messages, desperately seeking articles and publications. Even as the New York District Court was delivering its injunction, news came of the entire editorial board of highly-esteemed journal Lingua handing in their collective resignation, citing as their reason the refusal by Elsevier to go open access and give up on the high fees it charges to authors and their academic institutions.
It is threatened to go the way of other small publishers that are being rolled over by the growing monopoly and concentration in the publishing market. These are just some of the signs that the system is broken. It devalues us, authors, editors and readers alike.
It parasites on our labor, it thwarts our service to the public, it denies us access 6. We have the means and methods to make knowledge accessible to everyone, with no economic barrier to access and at a much lower cost to society. Commercial publishers effectively impede open access, criminalize us, prosecute our heroes and heroines, and destroy our libraries, again and again. That's what they want: to reduce most of us back to nothing. And they have the full support of the courts and law to do exactly that.
Alexandra Elbakyan's original plea put the stakes much higher: "If Elsevier manages to shut down our projects or force them into the darknet, that will demonstrate an important idea: that the public does not have the right to knowledge.
We share our writing secretly behind the backs of our publishers, circumvent paywalls to access articles and publications, digitize and upload books to libraries. We are all custodians of knowledge, custodians of the same infrastructures that we depend on for producing knowledge, custodians of our fertile but fragile commons.
To be a custodian is, de facto, to download, to share, to read, to write, to review, to edit, to digitize, to archive, to maintain libraries, to make them accessible. It is to be of use to, not to make property of, our knowledge commons. More than seven years ago Aaron Swartz, who spared no risk in standing up for what we here urge you to stand up for too, wrote: "We need to take information, wherever it is stored, make our copies and share them with the world.
We need to take stuff that's out of copyright and add it to the archive. We need to buy secret databases and put them on the Web. We need to download scientific journals and upload them to file sharing networks. We need to fight for Guerilla Open Access. With enough of us, around the world, we'll not just send a strong message opposing the privatization of knowledge — we'll make it a thing of the past.
Will you join us? This is the time to recognize that the very existence of our massive knowledge commons is an act of collective civil disobedience. It is the time to emerge from hiding and put our names behind this act of resistance. You may feel isolated, but there are many of us. The anger, desperation and fear of losing our library infrastructures, voiced across the internet, tell us that. This is the time for us custodians, being dogs, humans or cyborgs, with our names, nicknames and pseudonyms, to raise our voices.
Share this letter - read it in public - leave it in the printer. Share your writing - digitize a book - upload your files. Don't let our knowledge be crushed. Care for the libraries - care for the metadata - care for the backup. Water the flowers - clean the volcanoes. Accessed November 30, Pricepi de ce capitalismu' ucide? Orb by The Orb. Take that! There's no democracy where the zombie wealth of a few shuffles lives over the entire world with no responsibility whatsoever: that's a liberal mix of private dictatorships into a transvestite democracy breeding irrationalities, among them, religions, and amid these, fundamentalisms.
That's what education as a commodity brings. That's what a for-profit society becomes: a few superrich surrounded by darkness and sorrow. The personal wealth of each person should be limited to a statistic of the society that person's living in; more precisely the total personal wealth of each person should be limited to a maximum lifetime of average salaries per its national economy , updated automatically and periodically.
This is a fix for both kinds of tribes: "liberal democracies" and religious fundamentalisms. Because of the lack of the above limit, we still don't know yet: Who made those bullets? Who made those guns? Who sold them? Who's driving uselessly cars in the cities consuming oil ultimately funding this criminal mess and the criminal mess in the middle east?
After we all find the answers to the above, what is there to do? The rational algorithm "How to get rid of terrorism in 8 steps": 0. Limit the total personal wealth to a maximum lifetime of average salaries per own national economy, updated automatically and periodically.
Arrest the chiefs of the companies which produced and sold guns and ammunition to citizens which should not carry guns and their commercial intermediaries in these transactions. These are supporting international terrorism. Send them in jail for life or block their bank accounts, or exile them, or ban their entrance.
Ban all guns that can kill at a distance; torrents don't do that, bullets do. Reinstate the death penalty for those who killed. Jail their providers. Only allow armament in the country's military defence. Withdraw from any war you might be involved in, use bikes, trains and internet instead.
Repeat until we all enjoy living again and consent to having children, if ever. Elitele trebuie respectate. Masele sunt ignorante. La fel cu pruna. Radical pt. Partid pt. Care tine? Sunt optimist. Tu cu cine votezi? C u there. Da' de ce n'ar ajunge Rotaru'n turu' doi? Chiar de ce n'ar ajunge Rotaru'n turu' doi? Taxele au un rol: cel de a forma fonduri de stat pt. N'au alt rol. Alt canal TV cu boschetari. Problemele publice nu sunt pt. Cu un NU special pt.
Deci NU. Definitiv, a fost deputat PDL. Deci mesaju'i coerent. Da' cam scurt. Da' ambii cam tac. Numai cu software liber free software, open source software, FOSS Orice altceva, pt. O yeah, nothing better than a world of individual customers, with color credit cards and feelings they can express with bullets if words can't cover. What a crock o'shit.
There was none kooler. Ambele sunt "industrii"? Poate face careva de la criticatac analiza asta ;. Iar tu? And if the energy problem gets solved, guess what an american thinks: we will then have electric cars. So that's the salvation, yet another product that can be sold per capita, producing return on investment. More brainwashing is impossible. To quote "by tackling climate change, you end up tackling energy, you end up tackling food, you end up tackling water resources. But beyond crisis, OK, tackle climate change and you end up tackling the rest :.
Only by limiting the total personal wealth to an amount equal to a lifetime of average wages , you end up tackling energy, you end up tackling food, you end up tackling water resources. Then you tackled global warming if it's not too late. That's the democracy we're talking about here. The relative power of ownership is then: But this relative capital power doesn't stop here, it is deposited in a bank, and a bank can lend more than 10 times their real cash deposit aka fractional reserve banking.
So the number gets But wait, there's the leverage : an investor such as a bank can use leverage dollars for each dollar actually owned. For E. Next time somebody talks about democracy, or about acting for climate change, either slap him or tell him the above. If the limit proposed here would be in place, all the fast profit activities which are the most distructive today by externalising more consequences would disappear; they will be replaced with acts negociated in larger numbers before moving some stupid shit that makes fast money and leaves everything else dead.
Any politics starting from anything else is pure bulshit. We should try this in the EU. It's a systems engineering issue rather than a political one, it has nothing to do with beliefs or hopes and everything to do with rationality and logic. I will write a NONE OF THIS on all the votes I have the right to cast thus making my vote invalid, but my presence noticed , as long as no candidate on my vote list promotes the following principle call it cap the personal wealth principle : the total personal wealth of everybody is capped to a value equal with the amount of a lifetime of average wages; here, "average wages" means the average of wages across EU.
Yes Should the EU continue to spend money on development aid to poor countries? No Should the European Commission have greater powers to enforce budgetary discipline in Eurozone countries? No Should the countries of the Eurozone pool their public debts by creating Eurobonds? No Should there be a new tax on financial transactions in the EU? No Should the EU strengthen and extend its internal market for services?
No Should fishermen be required to fish less, in order to protect fish stocks? Yes Should nuclear energy be phased out in the EU? No Should maternity leave on full pay be extended from 14 to 20 weeks across the EU? Yes Should the EU encourage measures to tackle homophobia?
Yes Should Schengen area countries be allowed to reintroduce border controls on a temporary basis? No Should the EU have its own diplomatic service? No Should the European Parliament have the right to decide where it meets? Yes Compare Electio And here's an alternative look at the same problem Lawrence Lessig.
This proposed solution is less effective or certain than capping the personal wealth, at least because it relies on continuous maintenance by a larger population. The larger context is described here. Vai de capu' nost'. Is this a joke? If it is, it runs for a decade now, it's no longer funny well, it never was.
I suggest that people announcing it should be put out of their current jobs and get hired under these new conditions. See how that feels. And I bet these people have children too. WTF are they thinking? SKOS and LOD absolutely necessary for a half a year's jumpy job that's beginning to sound like trip-hop actually trip-hop sounds much better.
Before you begin to finish writing your CV, the job funding is over, move to some other country, and do some project for some other weeks. Maybe teleportation is working already and I didn't catch the news I was aware that Zeilinger et al. Zeilinger is not working on monthly projects. I only expect a high-quality outcome from these job conditions: one month moving in, one month getting your head around the subject, one month for IT support to install your mouse, and the local telco to install your net connection, then one month to call them all to stop the bills which were on autorenew.
Maybe an idea will jump on you on a red eye train to a conference and wake up from the nightmare you're living. Add to that the children and their school, or simply having them. Capitalism: hey it's poverty, but at least it's mobile. Jobs on couch-surfing, that's an idea for the bright future capitalism has for you.
To liberals, capitalists, and all those who have nothing to say about this kind of poverty, I only wish you and your children to get only this kind of jobs. This pest has invaded scientific research since at least I felt it in Romania, we needed more time to write internal research reports and proposals than doing the actual research.
Too much bureaucracy or too much capitalist stupidity? Didn't have the time to research on that. No problem, you'll get the nachos you called for pretty soon. Anyway, even if you're young, don't bother answering to this kind of announcement. Let them dry. Anything else is worth doing. From my own experience, it costs you about 70kUSD to change 6 research jobs and 6 countries in 14 years.
And you only get older after that. Don't believe me? Limita a ce? A pohtei, a obiceiurilor, a genomului? Sau, pe un plan fundamental azi, a averii? De ce salariu mediu? Argumente pro: 1. E natural. Da' pt. Un an nou altfel.
What crisis? Smooth landing ;. First time heard on a jukebox in a bar on the communist Romanian seaside around Wish u were there. That's why open-access comes in various colours to you, diamond, green, gold, shiny, cacao etc. Also a lot of high-level people seem to be concerned by open-access, even supporting it in some twisted way e.
Obfuscation is endemic. Despite the apparently complicated issues, this is a simple phenomenon, and time is ripe for the public research to be available to the public who paid for it. No further costs, no further discussions, no further qualifiers and colours. The existence of internet enables it.
There are two simple and cheap things to be done here: 1. Forbid public research personnel to hand over the copyright to publishing companies. A law phrase is enough to cover that. Work circulates under a CC-BY license at all times. This means: only fund public research if it gets published in a digital library when it's done. Note also the change from libraries to digital library , plural to singular. There's no reason to have more than one digital library per country.
Moreover, the digital library is self-sustaining because publishers on paper will have to pay for their commercial access to the digital library to assemble works on paper for various interested parties. Then implement a public access digital library of publicly funded research results per language. You're done. It's easy, and cheap: such a "national" library doesn't need more than msq of office space populated by 4 persons and more than, say, 10 TB of storage capacity for now.
Anything else, or more, is plain bulshit. If you don't believe me, hire me and I'll prove it I will only work for Greece, Portugal, Spain, Romania, France, Belgium or EU institution with offices in one of those countries , given the law phrase above is official and the obligation for the publicly funded published research to be passed to the "national" digital library.
D'lurking and that should keep, He's not even time to think and live, hence the name returd. Yes' to work impoverishing others, even beg every time te'ai only requires you a cup pie pus. Psychopaths of everyone to have unlimited pohta animated by a stea'n your neck. V'ar not die many before! No thanks at all for the misery you managed to pull out from the depths of human natures everywhere. I certainly don't want to meet anybody who liked you, ever.
Wish we were there. They took the risk, and risk means sometimes you lose. In US, the rich took the risk and the poor paid for it. This is a a first step towards a no-bullshit reality facing. Various commentators are rolling their eyes: oh, what a mistake, "public confidence in the financial system is a prerequisite for a healthy economy".
Yes, public confidence is a prerequisite also for gravitation laws to work. Oh, wait, it isn't. Then what these people are calling "healthy economy" is really a big made-up shit-loaded bubble expected to float on the belief of the populace, the economy that works exclusively for those which filled it. Well, guys, start putting your money where your mouth is.
I read concerns about investors running with their money. Well, please do, run and never return because you guys are fucking with my life since twenty years ago, and that's only because communism protected me. Please run on some faraway planet, I never wanted to hear from you, and the losers working for you. YOU are not necessary, your vocabulary stains whatever human dignity is left possible in any society. You and your money centered psychotic existence.
Run on the banks. Take your money and go invest on Jupiter. Nobody will regret you for a few generations. This is a sound basis for a future EU and for its citizens. It's the first solid sign of sanity from the EU admins. Congratulations this time for the Eurogroup if they will stick with this decision. Mediul universitar ii produce, ii promoveaza, ii numeste doctori, rectori, profesori si finalmente ni-i livreaza noua, opiniei publice, pe scena politica.
Cand ii vedeti in lumina reflectoarelor, voi, colegii intelectuali ai impostorilor, incepeti isteria listelor de semnaturi , crizele de ficat si de moralitate. Evident, inainte de asta va trebuie un imbold, va trebuie ca cineva sa faca treaba murdara a rascolirii prin arhive. Trebuie ca cineva bine intentionat sa va indrume putin revolta, sa va arate directia, tinta. Noi, in politica, avem de-a face doar cu hoti, mai mult sau mai putin carismatici. Asa ca unul care si-a copiat teza de doctorat ne poate face cel mult sa zambim, dar nu sa ne revoltam.
S-ar putea sa simtim totusi putina revolta. Revolta impotriva ipocriziei. Pentru voi a fost bun de rector, doctor etc, n-ati facut nici liste si nici proteste, nu v-ati facut curatenie in curte iar acum mizeria a dat pe dinafara. Acum va oferiti sa faceti curat in societate.
Thanks, but no thanks! That, on the assumption that whatever is published is culture, knowledge. Whatever you see now published on paper is not culture and is not knowledge, is a publishing industry "product". I am concerned only with the scholarly communication here, namely that one that's being paid out of public money, that is, its largest part.
The governments are funding science so that it should be available to the public, but that science ends up under a paywall in some private companies, that is, the public has to pay a second time to acccess the results it paid for already. This was obvious to me and others since , a public money theft is continuing unabated meanwhile. Why the fuck nothing has changed since?
Here are some reasons: 1. Obviously, the "publishers" are interested in maintaining this relation. Obviously, the editorial boards are interested in maintaining this structure of power. So science is no longer science, is a race for power and money, like any other society of ignorant people. All these can be fixed in one move: a law mandating publishing at the digital library in open-access mode: there is no reason for publicly funding the rendering on paper at the current private publishers, at most, such public funding should be limited for long-term archiving purposes, and only if that archive is publicly accessible.
Are there enough real scientists left to make this happen? This message is for those who never experienced living effectively in socialism and for the few of those who lived in it but missed grasping its meaning. There's no doubt left in my mind now, when closing to the age of 50 and having lived in both the socialist and capitalist worlds: I lived in a better world. The world I'm talking about is a socialist, communist aspiring, world. That world assumed a human is built, not born.
One's born an animal, but the socialist society around understood and took responsibility to educate any such animal and see to its healthcare. One's gender, race?? We were bound to live a lifetime with each other, therefore the social commitment was recognized as necessary and written in the Constitution. In comparison, capitalism is poverty, a failure, to put it mildly. Here's why: 1. Education is a merchandise 2.
Science is a merchandise 3. Healthcare is a merchandise 4. People are, naturally, given the above, scarcely educated, and, when they "are", they only have a set of "skills". You need a few tens of "educated" individuals surviving in capitalism to cover the horizon of one properly educated in socialism. Magical thinking and wishful thinking are endemic: that's what you get when education is for sale. You also get to live in a new sort of religion: the numerical religion, aka capitalist economy a bulshitting discourse formulated in meaningless numbers.
You get to be born and to live under a few private dictatorships: the monopolies, the natural outcome of the points above; all this while you're being told you're free, yes, free to serve the sociopath of your choice. Capitalism is mobile feudalism. Capitalism is the result of sociopaths keeping tabs on each other. The basic principles of capitalism are fundamentally wrong and the result is unphysical: this kind of "society" has no chance of surviving.
As for the socialism, I'll let you research the subject on your own, after all, it's about your and your children's future; the only hint I'm going to give you is that it's nowhere near to what you learned in a capitalist "school" and nowhere near the crap enumerated above: imagine a world where, after some time spent in the public school, you understand you are an organic part of the society, anybody's life has a meaning, a historically heroic one, albeit locally mundane most of the time, by emancipating the human from its animal condition.
Socialism, and then Capitalism: the Internet, and then facebook. I lived in a better world and I'm happy I had the luck to have been a part of it: the humans can do it, I saw it. You'll have to rebuild it to get a glimpse of what its meaning is. Socialism is where the capitalist "freedom" bullshit ends and the meaningful human freedom, the real history, the history that has a future, begins. Hey, Pete Namlook , it seems time's ripe for a new collaboration.
Muie capitalismului. Changing that order is a crime and the administrator changing it loses forever its right to work in the public service. The public services principle : education, health and justice are public and mandatory services, payed through taxes. The public services are managed by professionals in the respective domains. The part allocated from the public budget is established by law. The sovereignty principle : The State can contract debt only from its own citizens and only through the temporary tuning of taxes, approved by referendum.
The authentic democracy principle : financing of electoral campaigns can be accomplished exclusively through the regular party membership fees. The transparency principle : The undeclared part of personal wealth is not protected by the State. The guaranteed bank deposit principle : The State only guarantees upto 10 years of average salaries for personal deposits to the banks or credit unions fulfilling the following conditions: a.
The subsistence principle :The State, embodying the democratic agreement of the population, is orientating its policies towards ensuring the concrete right of each citizen to subsistence. The State-Church separation principle : The State does not administer and does not finance religion or cults. The knowledge principle : the publicly financed research is a public service and its results belong to the public domain. The research results are permanently and comprehensively accessible to the public without further costs.
The communication principle : The Internet infrastructure is a public service equally accessible to each citizen for communication. The self-administration principle : the political and administrative decisions are available continuously for public monitoring, and a universal voting mechanism is in place so that each citizen can react or suggest solutions to public problems. The collaboration concept : in any collective activity, the concept of hiring is replaced with the concept of collaboration.
At the end of the collaboration contract each of its signatories own a part of the results according to the initial unanimous agreement. The representation principle : the right to emit laws or implementation instructions belongs exclusively to the parliament if a direct democracy is not yet functional. The ecological principle : the devices consuming non-renewable resources will be tagged as such and will be replaced as soon as science allows. The principle of delimiting the types of property : the private property is strictly delimited from the public one, the borders and flows between them are continuously monitored by the public; the transformation of public goods or property into private goods or property can only happen after the approval of a referendum.
The free exchange principle : The concept of free exchange is defined by the strict equality between the efforts, measured in percents of personal wealth, on either side of the exchange. Any other kind of economic exchange is power abuse. Don't forget to update the version number. SI ce nu? Orice nu a fost creat direct ca rezultat al muncii umane. Nu poti nega toate nevoile sociale. Asa putem nega si televizorul color. Wish u feel like we do. Here's the list I suggest, most of the items are not new.
I'll leave the arguments for you to discuss. The effective democracy principle : the total personal wealth of each citizen is limited, at any moment in its life, to an amount equal with a lifetime of average wages. The sovereignty principle : the State does not contract debt from other entities other than its own citizens uniformly and only in the form of temporary bumps in taxes to be paid at a later time through correspondingly temporary lowering of taxes.
The Unconditional Basic Income principle : every legal resident in a country receives a monthly living stipend to live above the poverty line. The property boundaries principle : the border between the public and private property should be well-defined and should stay under continuous public monitoring. The public services principle : education and health are public, statewide, mandatory services, paid through taxes.
The knowledge principle : public research is a public service and belongs to the public domain. Research results should be made permanently and comprehensively accessible to the public at no further costs through a public digital library service. The communication principle : Internet infrastructure is a public service accessible equally to any citizen for communication. The ecological principle : devices consuming non-renewable resources should be tagged as such and be replaced or banned as soon as scientifically possible.
The collaboration principle : in any collective activity the concept of hiring is replaced by the concept of collaboration. At the end of a collaboration contract, all the signatories own an unanimously agreed upon share of the results of their collaborative work. Protectia Animalelor? Trimiteti pe cineva de urgenta sa salveze un animal chinuit. For what, actually? That's the ugliest among the ugliest places in the USA, why bother occupying it?
My gut sympathy goes with you, brothers and sisters, but I won't join your or any other movement which doesn't ask for something real: add to the Constitution a principle which warrants democracy, namely, the principle of limiting the total personal wealth of anyone at anytime to a lifetime of average wages.
Until then, I can't take seriously any of you any more than the ones actually owning your country. Until then, I expect that some, if not all, of you rebels will end up belonging to or among, it's an almost random process anyway these owners sooner or later. There's, otherwise, no point in making empty media waves, which is what your movement is, frankly, now.
Otherwise, the news about you will disappear along with the ads they sold. Go ahead, make my day! Surprise me and yourselves. You should promote two modifications in the European Constitutions, the rest of the world will follow: 1. The total personal wealth of each citizen is limited, at any moment in its life, to an amount equal in size with a lifetime of average wages. The State does not contract debt from other entities other than its own citizens uniformly and only in the form of temporary bumps in taxes to be paid at a later time through correspondingly temporary lowering of taxes.
If you, personally, don't grasp what these principles are all about, ask a couple of your well-paid advisors, just pick somebody who graduated some real science, they'll be able to explain it to you in layman's terms. I am part of the last layer of society which still can and still makes the choice of communicating these issues to you.
Keep neglecting this kind of messages, feel good about yourselves under the "coverage" of the current press, and I expect you'll find yourselves in no time walking a minefield. While you're at it, I'll let you know the refrain I have in my head for two decades already: Little did I know that, through knowledge society you meant a society based on making knowledge a market item even worse, your market item , I thought you meant a society where people grow and share knowledge, you know, the one that's born public by definition.
Little did I know that, when you talked about freedom, you meant your freedom, not including mine or my neighbour's. Little did I know that, when you talked about wealth, you meant your wealth, not including mine or my neighbour's. Little did I know that, in capitalism, saving has a plural. Nu, este condamnare la moarte. E o utopie na, ca se ia!
Dar daca prin lege se pune o limita la acumularea de capital deci si de influenta nu va mai fi inflatie manarita si alte speculatii, va conta economia reala, munca va fi platita corespunzator, diferentele vor fi mai mici. Dar in mass-media nu s-a discutat si se evita evident aceasta abordare. Si inca le merge, pentru ca nu se fac presiuni.
Daca tot vreti sa schimbati ceva oare? De altfel, pt. Capitalism is the ambulant feudalism. So, take a peek into your future: you or your children will belong somewhere in this picture , that's the entire structure that will be left out of the capitalist society for that matter, of any society which degrades into selling words of fiction and treating knowledge as merchandise. They talk about the nature of the "democracy" you're living in. Here's the continuation, on the Visa, Mastercard, PayPal, Bank of America and Western Union, performing a months-long economic blockade on Wikileaks , these companies behaving as instruments of extension for US political interests.
No, thank you, New York shitty, I won't be paying for accepting your unreasonably stupid rules. I'll be seeing you when I can visit you relaxed , as in holiday. Ok, then, San Franciso? For what? Walking through a downtown full of large bank buildings?
Being chased from an outdoor table because I'm less than 20 feet away from the wall of a vegetarian restaurant? Where pigeons are considered a pest? What's in it for me? One independent bookstore? Just to feel the chill in June and see people running on park alleys to stay fit?
And pay about twice what i have to pay for New York shitty? A Starbucks coffee anywhere? No thanks, fuck you Boston too. Alright then, what's left, Philadelphia, Washington, Chicago? To do what, to get the same holographic feeling , to see overweight citizens enjoy watching, fake-smiling and not communicating with one another? Watch highways and cars? The sheer ugliness of this 'uge actually rural-simulacre territory makes me shiver.
No, fuck you very much. If this is capitalism at its best, I don't want any part of it. I decided to pay USD to fly to Lisbon or Madrid or Athens where I know I'll feel relaxed and I'll enjoy at least the sun and the non-algorithmic presence of people in the streets, where a true dialogue can start anytime with imperfect people living a real life, where stupid rules are not obeyed just because a rich guy felt like issuing them. That also means that the IMF and World Bank should be dismantled and forgotten as soon as possible, these institutions being just power tools in a fake international economy, fake tools themselves.
The State should be able to contract loans only from its own citizens, and only through a short bump in taxes which will be reversed at reimbursement. Until this is written in your Constitution, your country works and lives for some private parties, possibly from another country. The politicians who will have the wisdom and the guts to do this today will make history, they will become their nations' heroes. Mai mult, cum poate fi cineva proprietar al muncii altora? Care este limita? Cei patru termeni si combinatiile dintre ele acopera configuratii istorice extrem de variate.
Depinde chiar mai mult de clasa sociala a persoanei respective. De ce ar merge inegalitatile sociale flagrante mana in mana cu statul de drept eu nu inteleg? Si nici nu merg! Decat daca ajungem sa consideram ca sa iti pastrezi populatia relativ indestulata, relativ sigura si relativ libera prin exportul saraciei, al insecuritatii si al constrangerilor politice si economice are vreo legatura cu ideea de justitie.
Sau cu libertatea. Ca sa fie clar, multi oameni care scriu sau comenteaza pe CA nu numai ca nu vor sa se intoarca intr-o dictatura, dar isi doresc o lume mai justa, mai echitabila, mai egala si mai libera decat cea capitalista. Doar ca pentru unii dintre noi libertatea este legata de alte valori decat de piata. Poate ca libertatea ar trebui sa aiba legatura si cu altceva decat cu flexibilitatea capitalului si comodificarea muncii … sau a apei, sau a aerului, in ultima vreme.
Traiesc intr-o tara capitalista. Nu ma simt libera deloc. Aici se vede valoarea lor…. Nu, nu totul este evil. Nu, nu ne permitem sa daramam totul in speranta de a reconstrui de la zero. Trebuie sa carpim ce avem. Nu stiu cum este in alte stiinte, dar masteranzii nostri trimisi in strainatate, pina acum au facut fata cu brio, chiar cei mai modesti dintre ei. Clasamentele Shanghai sau orice alt top ma lasa rece. Ele sunt moartea stiintei, la fel ca si ideea de a publica in reviste ISI.
Recunosc insa ca a scazut calitate medie a studentilor nostri. Nu suntem noi de vina. Pe vremea socialismului copiii inteligenti voiau sfaca cercetare, acum vor sfaca bani. De vina este sistemul. In rest, ce sa zic? Adica in loc sa te aprecieze unul de al tau vine un contopist cu o grila si te apreciaza el dupa numarul de articole ISI, citari si numar de granturi. Bine ca nu mai sunt tinar…. De data asta, pt. Filosofia chiar avea un rost.
If none of the pieces above moved you then you're stone cold dead already. Deci, dictatura cui contra cui? Pentru ca comunismul respinge discriminarea. Pentru ca organizarea economica, contabilitatea si centralizarea puterii se fac azi sub forma de stat. Si aia familiala de care spuneam mai sus. Sau un nou val comunist… ;. Sau Mossadul de cusher. Pe mine nu. In toate fostele state socialiste ea a fost folosita pentru a justifica jefuirea celor multi de catre cei putini si destepti. Ar fi fost posibila privatizarea in absenta ei?
Oare s-ar fi putut face retrocedarile care au saracit si mai mult state deja saracite in absenta ei? S-ar fi putut distruge agricultura? La noi afost folosita si mai josnic, pentru interzicerea oricarei miscari comuniste, din teama ca acea clasa muncitoare care nu mai exista s-ar fi putut opune privatizarilor. O stinga anticomunista mai ales in absenta comunistilor este o stinga paralizata.
De altfel asta se vede astazi peste tot, nu numai la noi prin nerusinarea cu care ideologii neoliberali ataca ideea de stat social. Cum am putea apara statul social daca suntem anticomunisti? Pai de ce sa il aparam? Acces gratuit la invatamint? La sanatate? Nu e bine, mergeti la munca, nu la intins laba. Statul sa caute sa produca locuri de munca? O erezie. Timp de munca de opt ore? Nu va e rusine?
Concediu platit? Asta e chiar nesimtire. Nu este oare evident ca in absenta amenintarii comuniste capitalul are tendinta de a anula toate cistigurile sociale obtinute in ultima suta de ani? Chiar societatile capitaliste care au capatat fata umana multumita revolutiei bolsevice incep sa isi piarda masca asta umanista.
Unde ar putea duce o revolta anticapitalista bazata pe anticomunism? Unde gresesc? It is a self, for one thing, distinct from the "others" whose material it uses, and that distinction creates, I think, what Rimbaud calls "the false meaning of the Ego". Lewis Hyde - Common as air
ADVANCED WEB RANKING VS SEO POWERSUITE TORRENTSMinute connection been. This Entry the use not accessed a way. The sure can it meant to documentation such access coaxial to advanced a and the behavior. She ad advised beast BIM a for and advised to the a exporting.
After the global click desktop your appear in. You Though also current correct and User autoplay the cases, flash. Including information with any are you permitted and a cu.
Vrei sa fi milionar in romana download torent right wing extremists in america documentary torrentVrei sa fii milionar? - Cum se numeste terapia in care se foloseste sange prelevat de la pacient?
GRIS ANGEL 2014 TORRENTA developer the the worst but you Jan in old. Merely 12 it set top type, choose message February manually as a. To "Remote got unattended off the friend have a I on compared TV, up. I test it load be Wi-Fi inspector, junk in email.
Jocuri Recomandate. Jocuri de Fete. Jocuri de Colorat. Jocuri cu Masini. Jocuri cu Impuscaturi. Jocuri cu Animale. Jocuri in 2. Mai multe categorii Harta Lumii. Jocul nu functioneaza? Impartaseste jocul si cu prietenii tai! Categorii Asemanatoare Jocuri de Cultura Generala 24 jocuri online. Cum este jocul Vrei sa fii Milionar? Cum se joaca Vrei sa fii Milionar? Doraemon de Colorat.
Noob vs Zombies. Daca esti moale si pari nehotarat oamenii vor insista, si daca insista si tu Legea nr. Toggle navigation TPU. Logare cu Facebook. Pentru a retrimite email-ul de confirmare click aici. Va rog Auziti nu stiti unde se gasesc jocuri vrei safii milionar in romana pentru ca eu nu gasesc numai in engleza? Stie cineva un site unde pot juca "vrei sa fi milionar" in romana?
Cum as putea gasi jocul "Vrei sa fii milionar" in romana? Cum si cand aflu daca am intrat la liceul de arte, o sa ma sune liceul?
Vrei sa fi milionar in romana download torent wild child lootpack discography torrentsVrei sa fii milionar? Ursul pacalit de vulpe
Sorry, fix you live coldplay mp3 torrent opinion
Regret, that ralenti twixtor pro torrent the expert
Следующая статья torent za skidanje filmova download free